|
ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER
ISSUE No. 8 |
July 27, 2006 |
|
CALENDAR: There are no Commission meetings scheduled for July and August. The next public meeting will take place in September. |
| New Jersey Sentencing News |
July 20, 2006
Star Ledger
Death Penalty Foes Call for End to Law, Say Life in Prison is Option
July 19, 2006
Star Ledger
Panel Takes Up Life or Death Debate
July 19, 2006
CourierPost.com
Death Penalty Opponents Release Report
July 14, 2006
Star Ledger
Getting Off Easy in Essex
July 13, 2006
Star Ledger
High Court Hones Rules for Appeals
July 5, 2006
CourierPost.com
NJ Supreme Court Sets Aside Death Sentence
June 21, 2006
The Examiner
Editorial: Reduce Gang Violence, Change Sentencing Laws
|
| |
| National Sentencing News |
July 23, 2006
Sacramento Bee
Op Ed: Slammer Time : Why Rush To Build More Prisons When Other Options Cost Less
July 17, 2006
United Press International
No Race Bias Seen in Death Penalty Demand
July 15, 2006
Associated Press
State Promises Major Reforms for Juveniles
July 11, 2006
Orange County Register
Justice Laments Sentencing Rules
July 10, 2006
Washington Post
It’s a Crime What We Don’t Know About Crime
July 8, 2006
Baltimore Sun
Lethal Injection Lacks Protocols
July 1, 2006
SFGate.com
Analysis: Prisons Unlikely to Topple Governor
June 29, 2006
Inside Bay Area
Drug Policy Reform Activists Suffer State, Federal Defeats
June 27, 2006
New York Times
Prosecutor Questions Drug Law Reforms
June 27, 2006
Los Angeles Times
Schwarzenegger Wants More Prisons Built
June 23, 2006
New York Times
Doctors See Way to Cut Suffering in Executions
June 22, 2006
The Economist
Crime and Punishment: Britain Needs Fewer Prisons, Not More
June 22, 2006
The Economist
The Clang of the Gate
|
| |
| Document Library |
Drug Policy
Death Penalty
General Sentencing Policy
|
| |
| Recent Sentencing Decisions |
New Jersey
State v. Elaine D. Morales-Pena, N.J. Super. (App. Div. 2006)
Docket No. A-5689-04T2
Held: In this appeal, the Appellate Division reversed a trial court’s order enrolling defendant into the Pretrial Intervention Program (PTI) over the prosecutor’s objection in a case where the defendant was charged in an accusation with, among other related motor vehicle violations, fourth- degree assault by auto – leaving the scene of an accident. The trial court ordered defendant’s admission into PTI after his entry of a guilty plea to assault by auto. After initially observing that the PTI appeal should have been resolved in the trial court before the guilty plea was entered, the Appellate Division concluded that the prosecutor’s objection was prudent given that the disposition of motor vehicle charges in municipal court could jeopardize the indictable charges if defendant did not successfully complete the PTI program.
|
| |
NJ Commission to Review Criminal Sentencing | PO Box 095 | Trenton, NJ 08625-0095
Tel: 609.341.2813 | Fax: 609.341.2816 | Email: bennett.barlyn@lps.state.nj.us |
|